McPherson Buzz
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
McPherson Buzz
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Former US generals, admirals, and military service leaders warn against granting Trump sweeping immunity, citing potential chaos

Buzz Staff by Buzz Staff
April 11, 2024
in News
0
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jim Vondruska/Getty Images

The provided paragraph will be re-written in a more human-like and active voice, while maintaining the same writing style:

Jim Vondruska/Getty Images

Please note that I am unable to apply proper formatting, such as bold, italic, underline, ul, li, a (href=), h2 to h5, table, blockquote, and other tags.

    • Nineteen former military officials opposed Trump’s immunity bid in a Supreme Court amicus brief.
    • Trump, facing felony charges, claims he has “absolute immunity” from his actions when president.
    • The brief said immunity could hurt public trust, security, and the rule of law.

Nineteen former military officials have come forward with a compelling argument in an amicus brief submitted to the US Supreme Court. They firmly assert that granting legal immunity to former President Donald Trump could have devastating consequences for our nation.

“The former military leaders, comprising of nine generals, six admirals, and four service secretaries, emphasized the crucial role of the rule of law in both the military’s mission and the public’s confidence in the armed forces,” stated in a brief filed on April 8.

According to the critics, the former president’s approach not only poses a risk of disrupting military operations but also has the potential to severely damage the public’s trust in the military and discourage potential recruits from joining the armed forces.

During his time in office, Trump has argued that the president holds “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution. Currently, he is confronting federal charges related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Oral arguments for these charges are scheduled to commence on April 25th.

Trump has maintained his innocence in the face of the allegations against him, pleading not guilty. His defense team has put forth the argument that he is immune from prosecution, citing the Department of Justice and special counsel Jack Smith as they push the case forward. Smith, however, has taken the matter to the Supreme Court, urging them to dismiss Trump’s immunity claims.

Former military members outlined in the brief how granting immunity to President Trump, the former commander-in-chief of the armed forces, from felony charges would have adverse effects on the rule of law, civilian-military relations, and the smooth transition of power.

The brief highlighted the concern that granting immunity for alleged unlawful actions by the president would undermine the expectation of accountability. This could potentially compromise the commitment of US military members to obey orders from their superior officers while also recognizing their responsibility to refuse any unlawful orders.

The brief highlights the potential consequences of enabling the president to employ the military for “criminal purposes.” It emphasizes the challenging dilemma faced by civilian appointees and military officers, who may find themselves torn between obeying the commander in chief’s orders and upholding the laws of the nation.

According to the former military officials, the preservation of presidential immunity poses a potential threat to US national security. They argue that this lack of accountability might affect how other countries view the United States, particularly during a period when authoritarian powers are gaining influence.

Mark Esper, Trump’s former Secretary of Defense, disagreed with the brief and Trump’s immunity plea. In response, he told CNN’s Katie Hunt, “The president doesn’t have immunity on these types of issues. It’s just absurd.”

Read the original article on [source website].

Previous Post

Biden administration introduces new regulations targeting unlicensed dealers involved in black-market gun sales

Next Post

Parents of Michigan shooter, James and Jennifer Crumbley, receive 10 to 15-year prison sentence

Next Post

Parents of Michigan shooter, James and Jennifer Crumbley, receive 10 to 15-year prison sentence

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Jackson County: Judge Sentences Convicted Killer to 40 Years for KCMO Murder
  • Kansas Lawmakers Respond to Secret Service Director’s Resignation
  • Drainage Project Starts Monday; Euclid and Ash Intersection to Close
  • Georgia Rent Increase Laws 2024: What Tenants Should Know
  • Latestsports: States Grant Teachers Increased Authority to Expel Students Who Fail to Comply with Regulations.

About US

McPherson Buzz is an independent, locally owned, online news publication centered on local news. This completely free publication is for the residents of the McPherson area. It is produced by locals who care about the community.

Filling a need for a local news outlet, The Buzz strives to provide timely and innovative coverage of local sports, politics, events, education and the people of McPherson County.

  • About Us
  • Advertise With US & Write For Us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy for Digital Millennium Copyright
  • Editorial Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Fact-Checking Policy
  • Grievance Redressal
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • We Are Hiring

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.