Jennifer and James Crumbley, the parents of a school shooter in the U.S. who were convicted of involuntary manslaughter for the attack, were handed a prison sentence of 10 to 15 years on Tuesday in a Michigan courtroom.
During the court proceedings, the heart-wrenching statements of Tate Myre, 16, Hana St. Juliana, 14, Madisyn Baldwin, 17, and Justin Shilling, 17’s family members were shared. These young students tragically lost their lives when Ethan, the son of the Crumbleys, unleashed a shooting rampage at Oxford High School in Michigan on November 30, 2021.
Through tearful eyes, Nicole Beausoleil, Baldwin’s mother, expressed her deep anguish, holding the parents responsible for the tragic outcome. She firmly stated, “You are the ones who brought this into existence. As parents, you have failed. The consequences that await you can never truly make up for your negligence.”
Beausoleil vividly recounted the last moments of her daughter’s life, drawing a stark comparison between their tragic end and the actions of the Crumbleys leading up to and during the shooting. She emotionally shared, “As you sent a text pleading ‘Ethan, don’t do it,’ I was desperately messaging Madisyn, pouring out my love and begging her to call me.”
As Reina St. Juliana spoke about her sister Hana, tears welled up in the eyes of many. She expressed the heartbreaking reality that Hana would never experience milestones like prom, graduation, or birthdays.
Reina expressed her sorrow, “I never had the chance to bid farewell. Hana, who was just 14 years old, breathed her last in a school she had barely attended for three months.”
Jill Soave, the mother of Justin Shilling, pleaded with the judge to impose the harshest possible sentence on both parents. She expressed her deep anguish, stating that the devastating consequences of James’ and Jennifer’s inaction have affected everyone involved. She emphasized that this tragedy could have easily been avoided.
Judge Cheryl Matthews directly spoke to both parents before delivering the sentence, stating, “Mr. Crumbley, this court has determined that due to your actions, there was unrestricted availability of firearms and ammunition in your residence.”
She added, “Mrs. Crumbley, you have glorified the use and possession of these weapons.”
Both parents will receive credit for the time they have already spent in jail.
Matthews also prohibited the duo or any individuals representing them from communicating with the families of the four students. Furthermore, she stated that she would make a decision regarding the parents’ ability to reach out to their son.
Jennifer and James Crumbley took the opportunity to speak before the court delivered their sentence.
Jennifer Crumbley expressed that the impact of this situation on her heart and soul is indescribable. She acknowledged that her statement will not alleviate the pain and anguish experienced by the victims and their families.
Jennifer Crumbley clarified her trial testimony by stating that she would not have changed anything leading up to the shooting. According to her, this statement was completely misunderstood. She further mentioned that her son appeared to be “completely normal” and that she had no way of predicting the attack.
According to her, the prosecutors attempted to portray her and her husband as such terrible parents that only a school or mass shooter could have come from them.
“We were loving parents and an ordinary family. While we weren’t flawless, our love for our son and for one another was immeasurable,” expressed Jennifer Crumbley.
According to prosecutors, the Crumbleys have displayed a complete lack of remorse for their actions, as stated in the sentencing memo. They have been accused of purchasing the gun for their son and disregarding warning signs regarding his mental health.
Legal experts believe that this high-profile case has the potential to shape public perception regarding the responsibility of parents when their children gain access to firearms and cause harm. The verdict may also impact future decisions made by prosecutors when deciding whether to charge parents in similar situations. Only time will tell how this case will influence legal proceedings moving forward.
Why were the Crumbleys culpable in their son’s crimes?
This Article Includes
The Crumbleys’ son unleashed havoc in the corridors of Oxford High School shortly after his parents received a call from counselors regarding worrisome drawings he had made on a math assignment. Prosecutors alleged that the parents failed to disclose that their son had access to firearms at home and still allowed him to attend school that day.
James Crumbley acquired the firearm utilized in the shooting, while Jennifer Crumbley revealed on social media that it was a Christmas gift for their son. The prosecution argued that the parents had the ability to prevent the tragic incident by responsibly securing the weapon and addressing their son’s evident mental health challenges.
According to the prosecution, the teenager had sent messages to his mother months prior to the shooting, expressing that he had seen a “demon” in their house and witnessed clothes flying around. He also confided in a friend via text, mentioning his “paranoia” and hearing voices. In a journal entry, he wrote about his lack of assistance for his mental issues, which he believed was driving him to commit the school shooting.
According to prosecutors, the Crumbleys also attempted to escape from law enforcement once they realized they were going to be charged.
Defense attorneys argued that the parents never anticipated their son’s actions. When Jennifer Crumbley took the stand in her own defense, she portrayed herself as a diligent mother. James Crumbley’s lawyer asserted that the gun did not actually belong to the son and that the father had properly secured it, ensuring that his son did not have unsupervised access to it. In an interview with the Detroit Free Press, a jury foreman from James Crumbley’s trial highlighted the significance of the testimony regarding the storage of the gun, stating that it was a pivotal factor in reaching the conviction.
Parents asked for house arrest, time served
James Crumbley has requested to be sentenced to the time he has already served since his arrest in December 2021, as stated in the prosecutors’ sentencing memo. On the other hand, Jennifer Crumbley has expressed her desire to serve her sentence on house arrest, specifically in her lawyer’s guest house.
Prosecutors have dismissed the appeals made in the memo to the judge, arguing that both individuals have failed to demonstrate any remorse for their involvement in the tragic deaths of the four children. Additionally, James Crumbley has been accused of threatening Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald during a phone conversation while in jail, which is seen as a disturbing display of his lack of remorse.
Assistant Oakland County Prosecutor Marc Keast expressed strong opposition to the mother’s request for a proposed sentence, stating that it undermines the gravity of the tragedy caused by Jennifer Crumbley’s gross negligence. Keast emphasized that such a request is disrespectful to the victims and their families, considering the severity of the situation.
Each count of involuntary manslaughter can result in a prison sentence of up to 15 years. However, it is common for these sentences to be served concurrently rather than consecutively. The judge also has the authority to deviate from the state advisory guidelines, which suggest a sentencing range of 43 to 86 months, or approximately seven years at most. It is important to note that these guidelines are advisory and take into consideration post-conviction interviews and the specific circumstances of the case.
James and Jennifer Crumbley, the parents of the Michigan shooter, have been sentenced to 10 to 15 years in prison.